Showing posts with label NTA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NTA. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 October 2008

NTA's annual figures

I've been following with interest the debate that has followed since the release of the NTA's annual figures. Mark Easton, the BBC's home editor has reported on what he, like many others, sees as the farce that the NTA is trying to sell.


The NTA's figures concentrate on having 202,000 people in treatment last year but the people that left treatment drug-free was a bit lower - 7,324! I notice that they aren't shouting about that one! The NTA's focus is on getting people into treatment, that much is obvious, but for only a short time - 12 weeks. I say this because they have targets of 'retention in treatment' in which the box is ticked once people have lasted 12 weeks. But they don't have any targets for people leaving treatment drug-free! How can this be?

It seems to me that it's because the NTA aren't interested in getting people out the other side of treatment drug-free but rather more interested in getting people in for 12 weeks and job done! They don't care whether or not the service user achieves abstinence but rather that they are retained in treatment. The reason? So the public will think they're doing a good job and sleep safely in their beds tonight.

They do this by refusing point-blank to reduce the amount of methadone an individual will be receiving. It doesn't matter whether that person is stable, giving clear urine tests and meeting every demand they have. They will not reduce that methadone or send you to rehab, because they are scared to death that people will achieve a stable drug-free recovery and that will put them out of a job. The whole system stinks and people are starting to realise that, the charade is coming to an end. As the saying goes - you can't fool all the people all the time!

Millions upon millions are being wasted because the NTA won't admit they are wrong and change direction to focus on recovery and the things that will aid recovery, and not just keep on with their present tack of treatment for treatments sake, which, as their figures show, isn't actually helping many people to achieve drug-free lives. My fear is that when the public, as a whole, realise this there will be such a outrage at the wasted money that the drug and alcohol field's budget will be slashed and we'll be lucky to help many people at all.

Monday, 7 April 2008

DDN follow up on "Drug users are not dirty"

DDN (Drinks and drugs news) interviewed Bob Dale, service manager at Merseycare NHS Trust addiction services about the recent advertising campaign in Merseyside. Apparently service users were consulted, and had actually chosen the name and theme of the campaign which was then approved by the NTA's regional representative.

Bob Dale stands by the campaign saying it's already attracting a "steady response" from new clients. If this is the case, is it worth upsetting a few people in getting these results? Read the whole article and let me know your feelings.

http://www.drinkanddrugs.net/news.html